Hicks et al v. Makaha Valley Plantation Homeowners Assn. et al
Plaintiff: Charles Hicks, Deneen Hicks and Stacey Hicks
Defendant: Makaha Valley Plantation Homeowners Assn. and Hawaii First, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2014cv00254
Filed: May 29, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: HELEN GILLMOR
Presiding Judge: BARRY M. KURREN
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 161 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (ECF NO. 156 ) - Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 7/28/2016. "Plaintiff Deneen Hicks' Motion for Continuance (ECF No. 154 ) is DENIED< /B>. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 156 ) is GRANTED. Fourteen days have passed without response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for lack of prosecution. The case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), the Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT and CLOSE THE CASE." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Charles A. Hicks, Deneen Hicks and Stacey Hicks served by first class mail at the address of record on July 29, 2016.
July 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 150 TRIAL PROCEDURE ORDER DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS IN LIMINE NOS. 3, 8, 10 AND 11 re 106 , 112 , 113 , 114 and 147 - Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 7/13/2016. "Defendants' Motions in Limine Nos. 3 and 8 a re GRANTED. Motion in Limine No. 10 is GRANTED as to Chris Raquedan and Clifford Oliviera. Plaintiffs have WITHDRAWN Marjorie Collier, Gregory Sokolowski, Robin Heath, Keith Brunner, Attorney Arnold T. Phillips, Jelani Matabaraka, Julius Hudson, and Frank Condello as Trial witnesses." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Charles A. Hicks, Deneen Hicks, and Stacey Hicks shall be served by first class mail at the address of record on July 14, 2016.
July 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 137 TRIAL PROCEDURE ORDER DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS IN LIMINE NOS. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 9 re 105 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 117 - Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 7/7/2016. "Defendants' Motions in Limine Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 9 are GRANTED. Defendants' Motion in Limine No. 7 is GRANTED as to Attorneys Michael Kozak, John Zalewski, and Andrea Heckler." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Charles Hicks, Deneen Hicks and Stacey Hicks served by first class mail at the address of record on July 7, 2016.
June 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF No. 42 ). Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 6/30/2015. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on 7/1/2015 the date of this docket entry Modified service date on 6/30/2015 (ecs, ).
April 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' 45 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARRY M. KURREN on 4/9/2015. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
January 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS MAKAHA VALLEY PLANTATION HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AND HAWAII FIRST, INC. (ECF No. 28 ) WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 1/23/2015. ~ Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiffs may file an Amended Complaint by Friday, March 6, 2015. Plaintiffs are given leave to amend to add sufficient allegations to state a claim for: Violati on of the Fair Housing Act and the Hawaii Discrimination in Real Property Transactions Act based on race discrimination; and Violation of the Fair Housing Act and the Hawaii Discrimination in Real Property Transactions Act based on disability discri mination for failure to provide a reasonable accommodation. The Amended Complaint must conform to the rulings contained in this Order. Failure to file an Amended Complaint consistent with this Order by Friday, March 6, 2015, will result in dismissal of the entire matter. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
November 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDING DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE (ECF No. 25 ), AS MODIFIED. Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 11/21/2014. ~ Plaintiffs' Motion to Transfer Venue (ECF No. 25) i s DENIED. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on 11/25/2014 the date of this docket entry Modified on 11/24/2014 (ecs, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hicks et al v. Makaha Valley Plantation Homeowners Assn. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deneen Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacey Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Makaha Valley Plantation Homeowners Assn.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hawaii First, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?