Chan vs. Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC
| Paul Chan |
| Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10, DOE Corporations 1-20, DOE Partnerships 1-10, Doe Unincorporated Organizations 1-10 and Doe Governmental Agencies 1-10 |
| 1:2014cv00344 |
| July 31, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 46 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 08/24/2015. The court grants Wells Fargo's motion for summary ju dgment with respect to Count I (termination in violation of public policy claim), Count III (IIED claim), and Count IV (punitive damage claim). The court denies the motion with respect to Count II (retaliation in violation of section 378-62 claim) an d Count V (disability discrimination claim under section 378-2 and the ADA). (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
