Himmelfarb v. Rothko et al
Appellant: Douglas Bruce Himmelfarb
Appellee: Christopher Rothko and Marion Kahan
Case Number: 1:2014cv00352
Filed: August 6, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY
Presiding Judge: RICHARD L. PUGLISI
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 11 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 AMENDED ORDER AFFIRMING IN PART, VACATING IN PART, AND REMANDING IN PART BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDERS re 26 , 29 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 1/28/2015. "This court affirms the bankruptcy court's order holding Himmelfarb in civil contempt of the Stipulated Protective Order and the Amended Discovery Order. The court vacates the bankruptcy court order awarding legal fees and a civil fine, as well as the ruling that denied Himmelfarb's c ountermotion for contempt. The court remands to the bankruptcy court the matters vacated." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
November 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER AFFIRMING IN PART, VACATING IN PART, AND REMANDING IN PART BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDERS re 1 , 17 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 11/25/2014. "This court affirms the bankruptcy court's order holdin g Himmelfarb in civil contempt of the Stipulated Protective Order and the Amended Discovery Order. The court vacates the bankruptcy court order awarding legal fees and a civil fine, as well as the ruling that denied Himmelfarb's countermotio n for contempt. The court remands to the bankruptcy court the matters vacated." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. U.S. Bankruptcy Court served.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Himmelfarb v. Rothko et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Douglas Bruce Himmelfarb
Represented By: Christopher J. Muzzi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Christopher Rothko
Represented By: Jonathan Bach
Represented By: Robert G. Klein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Marion Kahan
Represented By: Jonathan Bach
Represented By: Robert G. Klein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?