James v. Honolulu, City and County of et al
| Choon James |
| Honolulu, City and County of and John Does 1-50 |
| 1:2014cv00478 |
| October 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| BARRY M. KURREN |
| J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DOC. NO. 13 ; AND (2) DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER REMAINING STATE LAW CLAIMS. Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 8/26/2015. (afc) WRITTEN ORDER follows July 6, 2015 hearing on Motions for Summary Judgment 13 , 16 . Minutes of hearing: doc. no. 33 . Order furthermore denies Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, doc no. 16 . Excerpt of orde r: p. 34, footnote 4: "Because the court grants the City's Motion for Summary Judgment on all of James' federal claims, the court likewise DENIES James' Motion for Summary Judgment to the extent directed to these same claims.&q uot;CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on August 27, 2015.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
