Cataluna v. Vanderford et al
Mary Gold Cataluna |
Vincent Vanderford, Queens Hospital, Hawaii, State of, Military Hawaii Department, Police State and Federal Housing Mayor Wright |
1:2014cv00480 |
October 22, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI |
RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 141 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 01/25/2016. -- Plaintiff's claims in this case are dismissed, and she is not permitted to file a second amended complaint. This Court DIRECTS the Clerks Office to close this case on February 16, 2016, unless this Court orders otherwise. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Filing 19 ORDER STRIKING PROPOSED COMPLAINT FILED ON JANUARY 28, 2015 re 13 titled "Second Amended Complaint" construed as "1/22/15 Proposed Complaint", filed by Mary gold Cabaluna, 14 titled Third Amend ed Complaint" construed as "1/28/15 Proposed Complaint", filed by Mary gold Cabaluna. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 02/27/2015. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Filing 7 ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 12/12/2014. This Court therefore ORDERS Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or file another Application to Proceed in District Co urt Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Plaintiff must do so by Wednesday, January 14, 2015, regardless of whether or not she files a second amended complaint. This Court CAUTIONS Plaintiff that, if she fails to either pay the filing fee or file another Application by January 14, 2015, this entire action may be automatically dismissed. If Plaintiff wishes to amend her IDEA claim, she must file her second amended complaint, in accordance with the terms of this Order, by no later than Thurs day, January 29, 2015.Further, this Court ORDERS Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or file another Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by no later than Wednesday, January 14, 2015, regardless of whether s he files a second amended complaint. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Filing 6 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 4 Findings and Recommendations. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 11/18/2014. (eps )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registere d to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on 11/19/2014 |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.