Quality Professional Industries Inc. v. Sun Power Corporation et al
| Maryann G. Quilala and Michael W. Watkins |
| Sun Power Corporation, Tom H. Werner, Robert V. Tadlock, Lydia Clary, Merced County, Roes 5 through 14, Tom Gunkel, Matriscope Engineering Laboratories, Inc. and Mortenson Construction |
| 1:2015cv00080 |
| March 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| BARRY M. KURREN |
| J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION, DOC. NOS. 15 & 40 ; AND (2) IN LIEU OF DISMISSAL, TRANSFERRING ACTION TO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 8/2 0/2015. (afc)Written order follows hearing held 7/27/2015. Minutes of hearing: doc no. 41 , CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronic ally at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. A separate Court's Certificate of Service will be entered when the case is electronically transferred to the Eastern District of California.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
