Smith-Marras v. General Nutrition Corporation
| Ronsonnette P. C. Smith-Marras |
| General Nutrition Corporation, USPlabs, LLC, SK Laboratories, Inc. and Doe Defendants 1-100 |
| 1:2015cv00188 |
| May 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND ORDERING CONSOLIDATION OF CASES re 5 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 12/09/2015. The Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint, fil ed on May 27, 2015 in Smith-Marras v. General Nutrition Corp., et al., CV 15-00188 LEK-KSC, and the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, filed on September 18, 2015 in Marras v. USPlabs, LLC, et al., CV 15-00329 LEK-KSC, are H EREBY DENIED. However, this Court HEREBY CONSOLIDATES CV 15-188 and CV 15-329 with Pavao, et al. v. UPSlabs, LLC, et al., CV 14-00367 LEK-KSC. In addition, Ronden Marras's request for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 is DENI ED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a motion that complies with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2). (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
