Streamline Consulting Group LLC v. Legacy Carbon LLC dba Hawaiian Legacy Carbon et al
| Streamline Consulting Group LLC |
| Legacy Carbon, LLC, Hawaiian Legacy Reforestation Initiative, HLH, LLC, Legacy Hardwoods, Inc., Legacy Holdings, LLC and Jeffrey Dunster |
| 1:2015cv00318 |
| August 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER ADOPTING Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation To Grand In Part and Deny In Part Defendants' Request For Attorneys' Fees and Costs re 108 . Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY. (cib)COURTS CERTIFICATE of Service - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion To Vacate or Modify Arbitration Award and Granting Defendants' Countermotion To Confirm Arbitration Award re 73 75 .The court grants Defendants' motion to confirm the arbitration award and denies Plaintiff's motion to vacate or modify the arbitration award. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and to close this case. Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 5/10/2019. (cib)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION re 37 - Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 3/16/2016. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER (1) DETERMINING THAT CLAIMS ARISING UNDER THE SERVICING AND NON-CIRCUMVENTION AGREEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO ARBITRATION AND DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS; (2) DENYING REQUEST FOR FEES; AND (3) STAYING CASE EXCEPT WITH RESPECT TO THE ISSUE OF WHICH DE FENDANTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT re 7 , 8 , 25 - Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 1/27/2016. "With respect to the parties' motion seeking to compel arbitration, this court determines that claims arising under the Services Agreement and/or the Non-Circumvention Agreement are subject to mandatory arbitration. But before sending any party to arbitration, this court will determine which parties are subject to the arbitration agreement. The court therefore stays this action, except with respect to the issue of which parties are subject to the arbitration agreement. The court denies Defendants' motion to dismiss and request for sanctions." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
