Young v. Kraus et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Young
Defendant: Michael M. Kraus, Hawaii, County of, Patrick T. Kihara, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10, Doe Corporations 1-10, Doe Partnerships 1-10, Doe Government Entities 1-10 and County of Hawaii, Police Department
Case Number: 1:2015cv00383
Filed: September 28, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Hawaii
Presiding Judge: KEVIN S.C. CHANG
Presiding Judge: LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 158 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION re 156 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 04/09/2018. Plaintiff's March 9, 2018 "Objection," which has been construed as a motion for reconsideration of this Court's February 16, 2018 order, is HEREBY DENIED. (eps, )COURTS CERTIFICATE of Service - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants served by First Class Mail to: Christopher Young; P.O. Box 1545; Pahoa, HI 96778 to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
February 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 155 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 152 Findings and Recommendations to Grant Defendants' Motion for Sanctions Against Plaintiff, ECF NO. 152 as supplemented by the January 24, 2018 entering order, EC F. NO. 154 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 02/16/2018. (eps, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
November 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 137 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 135 Motion For Reconsideration "Verification Plaintiff's Objection To Judge's Order", filed by Christopher Young. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 11/07 /2017. (eps, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications served by first class mail on November 8, 2017
October 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPEAL OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGES ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF AND THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ENTERING ORDER DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF THE SANCTION re 130 Objection, filed by Christopher Young, 129 , 125 Order. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 10/12/2017. This Court DENIES Plaintiff's July 10, 2017 appeal of the magistrate judge's: Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Sanctions Against Plaintiff, filed June 23, 2017; and, entering order determining the amount of the sanction award, filed June 29, 2017. The 6/23/17 Order and the 6/29/2017 EO are AFFIRMED. This Court ORDERS Plaintiff provide complete and detailed responses to the Tree Works Defendants' request for answers to interrogatories by November 9, 2017. Further, this Court orders Plaintiff to pay the $739.50 sanction to the Tree Works Defendants, thro ugh their counsel, by November 16, 2017. (eps, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
February 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER DENYING THE PORTION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION SEEKING RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT'S JANUARY 27, 2017 ORDER AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE PORTION OF THE MOTION ATTEMPTING TO APPEAL THE ORDER OR RULINGS ISSUED BY THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 109 , 110 filed by Christopher Young re 106 Order Patrick T. Kihara, County of Hawaii, Police Department and Hawaii, County of terminated.. If Plaintiff chooses to do so, he may file an amended appeal by March 3, 2017. Plaintiffs amended appeal must comply with the requirements described in this Order. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 02/17/2017. (eps, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registe red to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
January 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE COUNTY DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS CHRISTOPHER YOUNG AMENDMENT (SIC) OF COMPLAINT FILED MARCH 4, 2016 [DOCUMENT 35 ] re 38 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 01/ 27/2017. The County Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Christopher Young Amendment (sic) of Complaint Filed March 4, 2016 [Document 35 ] which the County Defendants filed on March 14, 2016 is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED I N PART. The Motion is DENIED as to the request to dismiss the Amended Complaint as untimely. The Motion is GRANTED as to the request to dismiss Plaintiff's claims against the County Defendants for failure to state a claim. All of Plaintiff' s claims against Defendants the County of Hawai'i, the County of Hawai'i Police Department, and Patrick T. Kihara in the Amended Complaint are HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. In addition, Count VI of the Amended Complaint is HEREBY DISMISS ED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendant Michael M. Kraus. There being no remaining claims against the County Defendants, this Court DIRECTS the Clerk's Office to terminate them as parties on February 15, 2017, unless any party files a motion for re consideration of this Order by February 13, 2017. (eps, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications served by first class mail on January 30, 2017
April 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER DENYING "VERIFICATION OF PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO JUDGES FAILIAR TO ADDRESS THE RULE 4 VIOLATIONS OF THE DEFENDANTS COUNTY'S COUNSEL IN THE REMOVAL ON 9/28/2015" re 34 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 04/ 19/2016. This Court ORDERS Plaintiff to respond to the 3/14/16 Motion to Dismiss by May 16, 2016. Any other party that wishes to file a statement regarding the 3/14/16 Motion to Dismiss must do so by May 16, 2016. The Count y Defendants' optional reply is due by May 23, 2016. This Court will take the 3/14/16 Motion to Dismiss under advisement thereafter and will consider it as a non-hearing motion pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(d). (eps )< hr>CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
January 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS THE COUNTY OF HAWAI'I AND THE COUNTY OF HAWAI'I POLICE DEPARTMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT PATRICK T. KIHARA'S MOTION TO DISMISS re 5 Motion to Dismiss re 10 Motion to Dismiss Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 01/29/2016. -- The Motion to Dismiss Complaint Filed July 21, 2015, which the County filed on October 5, 2015, is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, and the Motion to Dismiss Complaint Filed July 21, 2015, which Kihara filed October 30, 2015, is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff must file his amended complaint, consistent with the ter ms of this Order, by no later than March 2, 2016. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Young v. Kraus et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael M. Kraus
Represented By: Ronald Shigekane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hawaii, County of
Represented By: Laureen L. Martin
Represented By: Melody A. Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patrick T. Kihara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Corporations 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Partnerships 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Government Entities 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Hawaii, Police Department
Represented By: Laureen L. Martin
Represented By: Melody A. Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?