McCaughey v. Ansaldo Honolulu JV et al
| John McCaughey |
| Ansaldo Honolulu JV, Ansaldo STS USA, Inc., John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10, Doe Corporations 1-10, Doe Partnerships 1-10, Doe Unincorporated Organizations 1-10 and Doe Governmental Agencies 1-10 |
| 1:2015cv00400 |
| October 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI |
| RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 02/19/2016. -- Counts I and II of Plaintiff's Complaint, which this Court previously dismissed without prejudice re 14 , are HERE BY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This Court DIRECTS the Clerk's Office to close the case on March 7, 2016, unless Plaintiff files a motion for reconsideration of this Order by March 11, 2016. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S FED. R. CIV. P. 56(D) REQUEST AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FILED OCTOBER 1, 2015 re 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 01/12/2016. -- Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint Filed October 1, 2015, which Defendants filed October 13, 2015, is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as Counts I, II, and III are HEREBY DISMISSED, and insofar as the dismissal of Count III is WITH PREJUDICE. The Motion is DENIED insofar as the dismissal of Counts I and II are WITHOUT PREJUDICE. -- The Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint by February 17, 2016. This Court CAUTIONS Plaintiff that, if he fails to file his amended complaint by February 17, 2016, or if his amended complaint fails to cure the defects identified in this Order, this Court m ay dismiss his claims with prejudice. This Court also CAUTIONS Plaintiff that it has only granted him leave to amend Counts I and II to cure the defects identified in this Order. He does not have leave to add any new parties, claims, or theories of l iability. If he wishes to add new parties, claims, or theories of liability, he must do so pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
