JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Moniz

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Hawaii District Court JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Moniz

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Moniz

Plaintiff:	JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:	Stacy Moniz
Case Number:	1:2015cv00512
Filed:	December 11, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office:	Hawaii Office
County:	Honolulu
Presiding Judge:	BARRY M. KURREN
Presiding Judge:	DERRICK K. WATSON
Nature of Suit:	Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 25, 2016	Filing 34 AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 10 MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 10/25/2016. -- Moniz's Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the cas e. Re: 23 Order (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on 10/26/2016.
March 29, 2016	Filing 23 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 10 MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 3/29/2016. --The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEPart icipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Date Filed

Document Text

October 25, 2016

Filing 34 AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 10 MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 10/25/2016. -- Moniz's Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the cas e. Re: 23 Order (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on 10/26/2016.

March 29, 2016

Filing 23 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 10 MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 3/29/2016. --The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEPart icipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Moniz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Represented By:	Bernard Suter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Stacy Moniz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?