Bald v. Kuakini Medical Center
| Susan Bald |
| Kuakini Medical Center and Does 1-10 |
| 1:2015cv00525 |
| December 21, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| UNASSIGNED |
| RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTION DISTRESS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND AND GRANTING DEFENDANT KUAKINI MEDICAL CENTER'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FO R WRONGFUL TERMINATION IN VIOLATION OF PUBLIC POLICY : re 30 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD L. PUGLISI on 04/10/2017. 1. Plaintiff's claim for intentional infliction of em otional distress is preempted by Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act and is DISMISSED. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint no later than May 1, 2017. The deadline to file dispositive motions is extended to June 16, 2 017.2. The Court GRANTS Defendant Kuakini Medical Center's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's Claim for Wrongful Termination in Violation of Public Policy. (eps, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
