Lewis et al v. Honolulu Community Action Program, Inc. et al
| 1:2016cv00062 |
| September 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND RELATED NON-TAXABLE COSTS re: 108 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 2/21/2020. (jo)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF NO. 76 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 9/27/2019. "Relator has not met her burden of demonstrating a genuine issue of material fact as to all remaining counts of her Complaint. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 76, is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case file." (jo)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 38 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 9/13/2018. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part as to Counts III and VI and DENIED in part as to Counts I, II, IV, and V. (emt, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lewis et al v. Honolulu Community Action Program, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
