Lindstrom v. Moffett Properties
| Thorin John Lindstrom and Kristin Kathleen Lindstrom |
| Moffett Properties, William B. Moffett, Michael Reid and Does 1-10 |
| 1:2016cv00079 |
| February 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Maui |
| RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
| DERRICK K. WATSON |
| Other Contract |
| 23 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER DENYING (1) DEFENDANT MICHAEL REID'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND (2) DEFENDANTS MOFFETT PROPERTIES AND WILLIAM B. MOFFETT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 74 , 78 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 4/26/2018. For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES both Reid's Motion ForSummary Judgment (Dkt. No. 74) and Moffett Properties and William B. Moffett'sMotion For Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 78). Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (emt, )
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT MICHAEL REID'S MOTION TO DISMISS re 23 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 4/5/2017. "For the foregoing reasons, Reid's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Count I II (Breach of Express and Implied Warranties), Count IV (Rescission), and Count V (Tortious Breach of Contract) those claims are dismissed with prejudice. The claims for intentional misrepresentation (Count VI) and fraud (Count VII) are dismissed with leave to amend. The Lindstroms are granted limited leave to file an amended complaint, consistent with the terms of this Order, by no later than May 1, 2017. The Motion is DENIED as to Count I (Breach of Contract) and C ount VI (Negligent Misrepresentation)." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
