Williams v. Sequeira et al
| Emanuel Williams |
| Francis X. Sequeira and Delan Paleka |
| 1:2016cv00292 |
| June 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND re 1 Complaint filed by Emanuel Williams. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 07/05/2016. (1) The Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915( e)(2) and 1915A(a).(2) Williams may file an amended complaint on or before August 5, 2016, curing the specific deficiencies noted above.(3) Failure to timely amend the Complaint and cure its pleading deficiencies will result in entry of judgm ent dismissing this action for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915(A)(b)(1). This judgment shall constitute a strike, unless overturned on appeal. (4) The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Williams a blank pris oner civil rights complaint form so that he may comply with this order. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Plaintiff served by first class mail on July 6, 2016 with a blank prisoner civil rights complaint form as directed by this order
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
