Sluka v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC
||Margot Maria Sluka
||Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC and Doe Entities 1-20
||June 29, 2016
||US District Court for the District of Hawaii
||KEVIN S.C. CHANG
||J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT
|Nature of Suit:
||Truth in Lending
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 26, 2016
ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 15 ; AND (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 10/26/2016. (afc) Excerpt of Conclusion:"Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Specifically, Plaintiff's § 1635(b) claim is DISMISSED without leave to amend. Plaintiff's Request for Leave to Amend Compla int to assert fraud claims is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint by November 18, 2016. Failure to file an amended complaint by November 18, 2016 will result in dismissal of this action with prejudice for failure to state a claim ."WRITTEN ORDER follows hearing held 10/24/2016 on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Minutes of hearing: doc. no. 32 . ORDER further addresses 22 Defendant's Request to Strike Plaintiff's Exhibit 4 in docket entry no. 20 . The Court STRIKES Plaintiff's Exhibit 4, ECF No. 20-4. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?