Sivongxay v. Medcah, Inc.
||July 28, 2016
||US District Court for the District of Hawaii
||KEVIN S.C. CHANG
||DERRICK K. WATSON
|Nature of Suit:
||Truth in Lending
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 7, 2017
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO VIOLATIONS 1-3 OF THE COUNT I AND AS TO VIOLATIONS 1-5 OF COUNT II; AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO VIOLATIONS 1-3 OF COUNT 1 re 44 , 46 , 73 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 11/7/2017. "MEDCAH has met its summary judgment burden on all of Sivongxay's interest- related claims under the FDCPA and HRS. Because the underlying agreements either did no t provide a fixed rate of interest or provided for a higher rate, MEDCAH did not violate federal or state law when it applied interest at the statutory rate of 10% per annum under HRS § 478-2. Moreover, MEDCAH is entitled to summary jud gment on Sivongxay's claims relating to MEDCAH's account numbering system and credit reporting practices. The Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Violations 13 of Count I and Violations 15 of Coun t II (Dkt. No. 44 ) and DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Violations 13 of Count I(Dkt. No. 46 )." Note: MEDCAH's motion to strike, ECF No. 73 , is DENIED. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?