Grindling v. Kimura et al
| Chris Grindling |
| Heather Kimura, Monica Chun and DOE 1-5 |
| 1:2016cv00425 |
| August 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER: (1) GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS 6 ; AND (2) DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 10/20/2016. (afc)Excerpt of conclusion:"The [First Amended Complaint] is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Specifically: (a) claims against Defendants in their official capacities are DISMISSED without leave to amend; and (b) to the extent Plaintiff names Defendants in their individual capacities, § 1983 due process and access to the court claims are DISMISSED with leave to amend. Plaintiff may fil e a second amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his FAC on or before November 18, 2016."CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this d ocument electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). A copy of the instant Order and the "COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS (non-prisoner)" form has been served this date by first class mail to Mr. Chris Grindling at his address of record.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
