Envy Hawaii LLC v. Cirbin Inc.

Envy Hawaii LLC v. Cirbin Inc.

Plaintiff:	Envy Hawaii LLC
Defendant:	Cirbin Inc.
Case Number:	1:2016cv00551
Filed:	October 10, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office:	Hawaii Office
County:	Honolulu
Presiding Judge:	ALAN C. KAY
Presiding Judge:	RICHARD L. PUGLISI
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 21, 2018	Filing 50 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 49 Findings and Recommendations To Deny Envy Hawaii LLC's Motion For An Order To Show Cause Why Defendant Cirbin Inc., dba Campagna Motors Should Not Be Held In Contemp t And To Direct The Clerk's Office To Enter Judgment".. Signed by JUDGE ALAN C. KAY on 02/21/2018. (eps, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).
November 13, 2017	Filing 41 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 40 Findings and Recommendation To Grant In Part And Deny In Part Plaintiff Envy Hawaii LLC's Motion To Enforce Settlement Agreement And For Award Of Attorneys' Fe es And Costs.. Signed by JUDGE ALAN C. KAY on 11/13/2017. (eps, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).

Date Filed

Document Text

February 21, 2018

Filing 50 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 49 Findings and Recommendations To Deny Envy Hawaii LLC's Motion For An Order To Show Cause Why Defendant Cirbin Inc., dba Campagna Motors Should Not Be Held In Contemp t And To Direct The Clerk's Office To Enter Judgment".. Signed by JUDGE ALAN C. KAY on 02/21/2018. (eps, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).

November 13, 2017

Filing 41 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 40 Findings and Recommendation To Grant In Part And Deny In Part Plaintiff Envy Hawaii LLC's Motion To Enforce Settlement Agreement And For Award Of Attorneys' Fe es And Costs.. Signed by JUDGE ALAN C. KAY on 11/13/2017. (eps, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Envy Hawaii LLC v. Cirbin Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Cirbin Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Envy Hawaii LLC
Represented By:	Benjamin Maxwell Creps
Represented By:	Kevin W. Herring
Represented By:	Jae B. Park
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?