1250 Oceanside Partners v. Buckles et al
| 1250 Oceanside Partners |
| Roger Arnold Buckles and Cindy Kiyono Buckles |
| 1250 Oceanside Partners |
| 1:2016cv00585 |
| October 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
| Withdrawal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re: 23 , 1 . Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 5/25/2017. Excerpt of or der:"On May 11, 2017, the court issued an 'Order Adopting Amended Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Motions to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment' ('May 11, 2017 Order'). ECF No. 23 . On May 23, 2 017, Defendants Roger Arnold Buckles and Cindy Kiyono Buckles, individually, and in their capacities as trustees of the Roger Arnold Buckles and Cindy Kiyono Buckles Revocable Family Trust...submitted pursuant to Hawaii Rule of Professional Conduct 3.3 a 'Statement Re: Supreme Court Decisions on Standing in Foreclosure Actions' ('Statement'). ECF No. 24 . The court construes this Statement as a Motion for Reconsideration and/or Clarification under Local Rule 60.1 of th e May 11, 2017 Order." Excerpt of conclusion: "The court OVERRULES objections from both parties, and ADOPTS the Amended Findings. As recommended by the Bankruptcy Court, a decree of foreclosure in favor of Plaintiff sh all enter. Although the Bankruptcy Court recommended 'that the District Court enter judgment accordingly,' Amended Findings at 2, the court interprets the Bankruptcy Court's recommendation as contemplating further proceedings to imp lement such a decree of foreclosure, and to further address issues regarding a deficiency judgment (and at least to address whether the arbitration provisions should not be enforced by virtue of bankruptcy law). [citation omitted]. In this regard (as set forth in the May 11, 2017 Order), Plaintiff is directed to file a proposed form of a Foreclosure Decree by May 26, 2017. By June 2, 2017, Defendants may file objections, if any, to the proposed form of the Foreclosure Decree. A fter the Foreclosure Decree is entered, the Clerk of Court shall close the case file and the matter shall be remanded to the Bankruptcy Court for further proceedings consistent with this Order." WRITTEN ORDER follows hearing hel d March 3, 2017 and AMENDS the "ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT" filed on May 11, 2017 as ECF no. 23 . Minutes of March 3 hearing: ECF no. 21 . CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). All participants are registered to receive electronic notifications.
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re: 1 . Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 5/11/2017. Excerpt of conclusion:&q uot;The court OVERRULES objections from both parties, and ADOPTS the Amended Findings. As recommended by the Bankruptcy Court, a decree of foreclosure in favor of Plaintiff shall enter. Although the Bankruptcy Court recommended 'that the Dist rict Court enter judgment accordingly,' Amended Findings at 2, the court interprets the Bankruptcy Court's recommendation as contemplating further proceedings to implement such a decree of foreclosure, and to further address issues regardin g a deficiency judgment (and at least to address whether the arbitration provisions should not be enforced by virtue of bankruptcy law). [citation omitted]. In this regard, Plaintiff is directed to file a proposed form of a Foreclosure Decree by May 26, 2017. By June 2, 2017, Defendants may file objections, if any, to the proposed form of the Foreclosure Decree. After the Foreclosure Decree is entered, the Clerk of Court shall close the case file and the matter shall be remanded to the Bankr uptcy Court for further proceedings consistent with this Order." WRITTEN ORDER follows hearing held March 3, 2017. Minutes of hearing: ECF no. 21 . CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). All participants are registered to receive electronic notifications.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
