Barnes v. Henry et al
| Chad Barry Barnes |
| Kristin Kimo Henry and Howard M.S. Hu |
| 1:2016cv00588 |
| November 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
| DERRICK K. WATSON |
| Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER re 1 - Signed by JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE on 12/17/2019. For the same reasons identified by Judge Kobayashi in her May 22, 2019 Order, the bankruptcy court's November 15, 2016 Order Approving Sale of Boat and Trailer and Obligation of Debtor as Guarantor is HEREBY VACATED. (emt, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER GRANTING REVISED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING NINTH CIRCUIT APPEAL re 7 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 3/28/2017. "Based on the foregoing, Barnes' Motion to Stay is GRANTED. This matter is hereby STAYED until a final decision is rendered by the Ninth Circuit in the pending matter In Re Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLC, No. 16-15023. The parties are directed to advise the Court within ten (10) days of the Ninth Circuit's mandat e in that matter." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
