Trotter v. State of Hawaii et al
Plaintiff: Willie Trotter
Defendant: State of Hawaii, Hawaii Paroling Authority and Hawaii Criminal Justice Data Center
Case Number: 1:2017cv00016
Filed: January 12, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: KEVIN S.C. CHANG
Presiding Judge: SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER Granting Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. "Defendants' 23 motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted. Trotter's 26 motio n for judgment on the pleadings is denied. The court declines to allow Trotter to file an amended complaint, as any such amended pleading would be futile. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants' and to close this case." Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 2/15/18. (cib, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. Copy of order mailed to Plaintiff Willie Trotter
January 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING SERVICE re 2 - Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 1/18/2017. "The court directs the Clerk of Court to send Trotter three (3) copies of the Complaint (one for each named defendant), three (3) summons (one for each named defendant), six (6) Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons forms (AO 398) (two for each named defendant), six (6) Waiver of the Service of Summons forms (AO 399) (two for each named defendant), and an instruction sheet. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the U.S. Marshals Service and the Attorney General for the State of Hawaii." (emt, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trotter v. State of Hawaii et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willie Trotter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Hawaii
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hawaii Paroling Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hawaii Criminal Justice Data Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?