ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Does 1 through 20

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Hawaii District Court ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Does 1 through 20

ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Does 1 through 20

Plaintiff:	ME2 Productions, Inc.
Defendant:	Does 1 through 20
Case Number:	1:2017cv00078
Filed:	February 21, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office:	Hawaii Office
County:	Honolulu
Presiding Judge:	SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY
Presiding Judge:	RICHARD L. PUGLISI
Nature of Suit:	Copyright
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 19, 2017	Filing 42 AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND MODIFYING IN PART FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE AWARDED AGAINST DEFENDANT FERDINAND PUMARAS. "The court ADOPTS IN PART AND MODIFIES IN PART the F&R. ME2 is awarded statutory damages aga inst Pumaras in the amount of $750. ME2 is also awarded $250 from Pumaras in attorneys fees and taxes. Finally, Pumaras is ordered to delete or destroy all illegal copies of Mechanic: Resurrection in his possession or over which he has cont rol and is enjoined from further infringingon ME2s copyright with respect to Mechanic: Resurrection. Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 10/19/17. (cib, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive ele ctronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
September 21, 2017	Filing 38 ORDER Adopting In Part And Modifying In Part Findings And Recommendation That Default Judgment Be Awarded Against Defendant Ferdinand Pumaras re: 35 . "The court adopts in part and modifies in part the F&R. ME2 is awarded statutory damages ag ainst Pumaras in the amount of $750. ME2 is also awarded $250 from Pumaras in attorneys fees and taxes. Finally, Pumaras is ordered to delete or destroy all illegal copies of Mechanic: Ressurection in his possession or over which he has co ntrol and is enjoined from further infringingon ME2s copyright with respect to Mechanic: Ressurection." Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 9/21/17. (cib, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to recei ve electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. Copy of order mailed to pro se defendant.

Date Filed

Document Text

October 19, 2017

Filing 42 AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND MODIFYING IN PART FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE AWARDED AGAINST DEFENDANT FERDINAND PUMARAS. "The court ADOPTS IN PART AND MODIFIES IN PART the F&R. ME2 is awarded statutory damages aga inst Pumaras in the amount of $750. ME2 is also awarded $250 from Pumaras in attorneys fees and taxes. Finally, Pumaras is ordered to delete or destroy all illegal copies of Mechanic: Resurrection in his possession or over which he has cont rol and is enjoined from further infringingon ME2s copyright with respect to Mechanic: Resurrection. Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 10/19/17. (cib, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive ele ctronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

September 21, 2017

Filing 38 ORDER Adopting In Part And Modifying In Part Findings And Recommendation That Default Judgment Be Awarded Against Defendant Ferdinand Pumaras re: 35 . "The court adopts in part and modifies in part the F&R. ME2 is awarded statutory damages ag ainst Pumaras in the amount of $750. ME2 is also awarded $250 from Pumaras in attorneys fees and taxes. Finally, Pumaras is ordered to delete or destroy all illegal copies of Mechanic: Ressurection in his possession or over which he has co ntrol and is enjoined from further infringingon ME2s copyright with respect to Mechanic: Ressurection." Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 9/21/17. (cib, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to recei ve electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. Copy of order mailed to pro se defendant.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Does 1 through 20
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: ME2 Productions, Inc.
Represented By:	Kerry S. Culpepper
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 20
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?