Lynch v. The Bank Of New York Mellon et al
Plaintiff: Robert John Lynch and Jennifer Ann Lynch
Defendant: The Bank Of New York Mellon, Nettleton S. Payne, III, Diane Elizabeth Payne, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Doe Defendants 1-50
Case Number: 1:2017cv00195
Filed: April 28, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI
Presiding Judge: RICHARD L. PUGLISI
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER Denying Defendants Nettleton S. Payne III and Diane Elizabeth Payne's Motion To Dismiss; and Granting In Part and Denying In Part Defendant Bank of New York Mellon's Motion to Dismiss re 30 33 ."On the basis of the foregoing, the Paynes' FRCP Rule 12(B)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Robert John Lynch and Jennifer Ann Lynchs Second Amended Complaint Filed on September 11, 2017 [Dkt. No. 29 , filed September 21, 2017 is HEREBY DENIED; and BONY's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' 29 Second Amended Complaint, filed September 25, 2017, is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The BONY Motion is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiffs' wrongful foreclosure claim against BONY is DISMISSED WIT H PREJUDICE. The BONY Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiffs' quiet title claim against BONY.BONY and the Paynes are ORDERED to file their respective answers to the Second Amended Complaint (except as to Count II which is dismissed) by August 21, 2018. The Court EMPHASIZES that this deadline will not be affected by the filing of any motion for reconsideration of the instant Order. If any motion for reconsideration is filed and granted, the defendants will be permitted to file amended answers, if necessary." Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 7/30/2018. (cib, )
August 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS NETTLETON S. PAYNE III AND DIANE ELIZABETH PAYNE'S MOTION TO DISMISS RE 10 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 08/15/2017. Th e Court GRANTS Plaintiffs leave to amend their quiet title claim against the Paynes. Plaintiffs do not have leave to add any new parties, claims, or theories of liability. Plaintiffs must file their second amended complaint by September 11, 2017. If Plaintiffs fail to file their second amended complaint by September 11, 2017, the claim will be dismissed with prejudice. (eps, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lynch v. The Bank Of New York Mellon et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Bank Of New York Mellon
Represented By: Patricia J. McHenry
Represented By: Robert A. Muckenfuss
Represented By: Elizabeth M.Z. Timmermans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nettleton S. Payne, III
Represented By: Michael C. Bird
Represented By: Summer H. Kaiawe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diane Elizabeth Payne
Represented By: Michael C. Bird
Represented By: Summer H. Kaiawe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Edmund W.K. Haitsuka
Represented By: Cheryl A. Nakamura
Represented By: Tom E. Roesser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Defendants 1-50
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert John Lynch
Represented By: James J. Bickerton
Represented By: Bridget Gallagher Morgan
Represented By: John F. Perkin
Represented By: Stanley H Roehrig
Represented By: Van-Alan H. Shima
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Ann Lynch
Represented By: James J. Bickerton
Represented By: Bridget Gallagher Morgan
Represented By: John F. Perkin
Represented By: Stanley H Roehrig
Represented By: Van-Alan H. Shima
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?