Gonda v. Recarte et al
Plaintiff: Justin Gonda
Defendant: Scott Recarte, Henry Moe, Praphan Puapong, Matthew Kuresa, Richard Banner, M.D. and John Doe
Case Number: 1:2017cv00292
Filed: June 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY
Presiding Judge: RICHARD L. PUGLISI
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Dismissing Second Amended Complaint In Part And Directing Service."(1) The Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED IN PART. Claims against all Defendants in their official capacity are DISMISSED with prejudice; claims against Governor David Y. Ige, Nolan Espinda, Jodie Maesaka, Francis Sequeira, and Denise Johnson in their individual capacities are DISMISSED without prejudice; claims against Dr. Richard Banner and Dr. Pedri in their individual capacities are DISMISSED without prejudice; claims against Scott Recarte, Henry Moe, John Doe, and Matthew Kuresa in their individual capacities may proceed and be served. (2) The Clerk is DIRECTED to send the completed service documents detailed above to the United States Marshals Service, w ho is DIRECTED to effect service on Defendants Scott Recarte, Henry Moe, and Matthew Kuresa as set forth above. (3) After service is effected, Defendants Recarte, Moe, and Kuresa DIRECTED to file a response to the Second Amended Complaint." Sig ned by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 10/18/17. (cib, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. 10/18/17 - Copy of Order mailed to pro se plaintiff Justin Gonda. 2 copies of order, second a mended complaint, summons, USM 285 forms, notice of lawsuit and request for waiver of service for summons form(AO 398), TWO completed waiver of service of summons forms(AO 399) as to each defendant Scott Recarte, Henry Moe and Matthew Juresa forwarded to US Marshal's Office
September 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Order Dismissing Amended Complaint In Part. The First Amended Complaint 9 is DISMISSED IN PART. On or before October 6, 2017, Gonda may either file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his claims that are dismissed without prejudice, OR he may notify the court in writing that he will stand onthe plausible claims defined by this Order. If Gonda fails to timely accomplish either option, the court will order the U.S. Marshal to serve the First AmendedComplaint as limited on Defendants Scott Recarte, Henry Moe, John Doe, Dr. Pedri, and Sergeant Matthew Kuresa. Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 9/15/17. (cib, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications rece ived this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. Copy of order and blank prisoner civil rights complaint form mailed to pro se plaintiff Justin Gonda
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonda v. Recarte et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Justin Gonda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Recarte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Henry Moe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Praphan Puapong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Kuresa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Banner, M.D.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?