Hoapili v. Enoki et al
| Dianne K. Hoapili |
| Elliot R. Enoki and Steven T. Mnuchin |
| 1:2017cv00384 |
| August 4, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KENNETH J. MANSFIELD |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion To Reopen The Case And Denying As Moot Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis. "This court recognizes that Hoapili is not a lawyer and may be at a loss as to how to proceed. However, her Motion To Reopen The Case does not address the underlying failure to state a claim that this court noted in previous orders. There is presently no undismissed complaint before this court, and Hoapili is not proposing to provide a belated amended ple ading that cures the problems identified in previous orders. With no basis on which to grant relief under Rule 60 and without any other provision that appears to apply here, this court denies the Motion To Reopen The Case. This denial renders the IFP Application moot." Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 12/14/17. (cib, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Dismissing Second Amended Complaint and DENYING Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis. "Hoapilis 16 Second Amended Complaint is dismissed, and the 15 IFP Application is denied as moot. The court grants Hoapili leave to file a Third Amended Complaint that states a viable claim against identified defendants no later than October 23, 2017. Hoapili may submit another IFP Application at that time.If Hoapili chooses to file a Third Amended Complaint,she must either pay the filing fee or submit another IFP Application. If Hoapili fails to timely file a Third Amended Complaint, or if she fails to submit another IFP Application or fails to pay the filing fee, this action will be automatically dismissed on or after October 24, 2017. " Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 10/4/17. (cib, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. Copy of order mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff Dianne Hoapili
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT 1 ; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 3 . Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 8/14/2017. (afc) Excerpt of conclusion: "The court grants Hoapili leave to file an Amended Complaint that states a viable claim no later than September 18, 2017. Hoapili may submit another IFP Application at that time.Failure to file an Amended Complaint, as well as to pay the applicable filing fee or submit a new IFP Application, will result in the automatic dismissal of this action on or after September 21, 2017."CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on August 15, 2017.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
