Chavez v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
Plaintiff: Luis C. Chavez
Defendant: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., John Does 1-10, Doe Corporations 1-10, Doe Partnerships 1-10, Doe Entities 1-10 and Doe Governmental Units 1-10
Case Number: 1:2017cv00446
Filed: September 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: KEVIN S.C. CHANG
Presiding Judge: LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI
Nature of Suit: All Other Real Property
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 169 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 168 - Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 9/27/2021. (emt, )
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 147 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 125 , 141 , 143 - Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 11/30/2020. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, filed August 28, 2020, is HEREBY GRANTED, and summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendants as to all of Plaintiff's claims in the Third Amended Complaint, filed December 4, 2019. There being no remaining claims in this case, the Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendants on December 15, 2020 , unless Plaintiff files a timely motion for reconsideration of this Order. (emt, )
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 143 EO: COURT ORDER RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION 125 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI) (afe)
August 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 124 EO: COURT ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' 122 EX PARTE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The Ex Parte Motion is GRANTED for the reasons stated therein. Def endants' memorandum in support of their motion for summary judgment and Plaintiff's memorandum in opposition shall not exceed thirty-five pages. The fifteen-page limit for the optional reply memorandum remains in effect. See Local R ule LR7.4(c).Upon the filing of the motion for summary judgment, the Court will determine whether to set the motion for hearing or to issue non-hearing briefing deadlines. If the motion for summary judgment is set for hearing, the filing deadlines set forth in Local Rule 7.2 will apply. (JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI) (afe)
May 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part Defendants' Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint re 48 . On the basis of the foregoing, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, filed January 23, 2019, is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as set forth in Discussion § IV. Plaintiff is CAUTIONED that the filing of any motion for reconsideration of this Order will not affect the filing deadline for the motion for leave to amend. Defendants are required to file an answer to the remaining portions of the Second Amended Complaint by June 28, 2019, unless Plaintiff files a motion for leave to amend. Defendant will, in that case, not have to file an answer until the magistrate judge rules on whether Plaintiff will be permitted to file a third amended complaint.Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 5/31/2019. (cib, )
June 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim re: 5 . "On the basis of the foregoing, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed September 13, 2017, is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART . The Motion is GRANTED insofar as: Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, filed on July 6, 2017 in state court, is DISMISSED, in its entirety; and the dismissal of Count IV Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages is WITH PREJUDICE. The Moti on is DENIED insofar as the dismissal of all of Plaintiff's other claims is WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff must file his second amended complaint by September 21, 2018, and it must comply with the rulings in this Order. This Court EMPHASIZE S that the filing of any motion for reconsideration of this Order does not affect the deadline for Plaintiff to file his second amended complaint." Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 6/27/2018.(cib, )COURTS CERTIFICATE of Service - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chavez v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Luis C. Chavez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Represented By: Jenny Nakamoto
Represented By: James B. Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Represented By: Jenny Nakamoto
Represented By: James B. Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.
Represented By: Jenny Nakamoto
Represented By: James B. Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Corporations 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Partnerships 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Entities 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Governmental Units 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?