Cislo v. Fuchigami et al
| Timothy J. Cislo |
| Ford N. Fuchigami, Ross M. Higashi, Roy Sakata, Abigail Lareau and Department of Transportation - Airports Division, State of Hawaii |
| 1:2017cv00487 |
| September 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KENNETH J. MANSFIELD |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS 15 . Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 12/22/2017. (afc) WRITTEN ORDER follows hearing held 12/11/2017. Minutes of hearing: ECF 29 . Docket text entry modified on 12/22/2017 to note:ORDER furthermore gives leave for plaintiff to amend his complaint consistent with the instant order. "Any Amended Complaint must be filed no later than January 12, 2018. If no Amended Complaint is filed by that date, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and to close this case." CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry Modified on 12/22/2017 (afc, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
