Bralich v. Sullivan et al
| Philip A. Bralich |
| Barry A. Sullivan, Microsoft Corporation, Mark Piesner, Chris Fry, John Batali, William O'Grady, Peter Morreli, Craig Weissman, Sam Pullara, Scott Ziegler, Twitter, Thrownet A. CA-Corp., Thrownet B. MA-Corp., Salesforce.com Inc., Stanford University and Nuance Communications |
| 1:2017cv00547 |
| November 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| ALAN C. KAY |
| RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
148
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SULLIVAN'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT, DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS, AND DISMISSING THE CASE re: 142 - Signed by JUDGE ALAN C. KAY on 9/17/2019. "For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant Sullivan's Motion to Dismiss as unopposed in its entirety, and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend as against Defendant Sulliv an under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Court further acts sua sponte to DISMISS Plaintiff's claims for lack of prosecution with prejudice and without leave to amend as against all Defendants." (jo)COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants will be served by First Class Mail on September 18, 2019 to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
139
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS STANFORD UNIVERSITY AND NUANCE COMMUNICATION, INC.'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS re 12 MOTION to Dismiss, re 15 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by JUDGE ALAN C. KAY on 04/23/2018. Th e Court GRANTS Defendants Stanford University and Nuance Communication's Motions to Dismiss, ECF Nos. 12, 15. Both Stanford and Nuance are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of personal jurisdiction, subject to discovery revealing a basis for per sonal jurisdiction over them consistent with the Court's discussion above regarding the elements of personal jurisdiction. The Court previously granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint to add Twitter back as a defendant and to add ress the deficiencies noted in the Salesforce Order. See generally ECF Nos. 130 (granting leave to amend to add Twitter), 134 (Salesforce Order). The Court now specifies that Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this Order to file an ame nded complaint. In amending, Plaintiff should not include any claims or any defendants who have been dismissed with prejudice. (eps, )COURTS CERTIFICATE of Service - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to: Philip A. Bralich; 815 Filmore St; Monterey, CA 93940 and William O'Grady; 6770 Hawaii Kai Dr #709; Honolulu, HI 96825 to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER ADOPTING AS MODIFIED MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S re 74 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re: 24 MOTION to Remand filed by Philip A. Bralich, re: 74 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Court REFERs: 77 MOTION for Summary Judgm ent For Failure To Respond To Interrogatories Sent November 15, 2017 With Responses Due December 15, 2017 Or In The Alternative To Compel Responses To Said Interrogatories filed by Philip A. Bralich to Judge Puglisi. Signed by JUDGE ALAN C. KAY o n 01/23/2018. (eps, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry: Philip A. Bralich; 815 Filmore St; Monterey, CA 93940
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
