Settle v. USA

Settle v. USA

Petitioner:	Ruben Settle
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	1:2017cv00565
Filed:	November 6, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office:	Hawaii Office
County:	Honolulu
Presiding Judge:	KEVIN S.C. CHANG
Presiding Judge:	SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 21, 2017	Filing 3 ORDER Granting Petitioner Ruben Settle's Motion To Dismiss His Own 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion Without Prejudice. "This court grants the request to dismiss the § 2255 motion without prejudice. So that there is no con fusion, this court reminds Settle that, as set forth in this court's earlier orders in this very case, any § 2255 motion is subject to a limitations period, and any second or successive § 2255 motion must be certified by the Ninth Circ uit Court of Appeals. With the dismissal of Settle's § 2255 motion, the present § 2255 matter is concluded, and the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the United States with respect to Settle's § 2255 mo tion.". Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 12/21/17. (cib, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Date Filed

Document Text

December 21, 2017

Filing 3 ORDER Granting Petitioner Ruben Settle's Motion To Dismiss His Own 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion Without Prejudice. "This court grants the request to dismiss the § 2255 motion without prejudice. So that there is no con fusion, this court reminds Settle that, as set forth in this court's earlier orders in this very case, any § 2255 motion is subject to a limitations period, and any second or successive § 2255 motion must be certified by the Ninth Circ uit Court of Appeals. With the dismissal of Settle's § 2255 motion, the present § 2255 matter is concluded, and the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the United States with respect to Settle's § 2255 mo tion.". Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 12/21/17. (cib, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Settle v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	Mark A. Inciong
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Ruben Settle
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?