Botelho v. Transportation Security Administration
| Michael Botelho |
| Transportation Security Administration and Elaine C. Duke |
| 1:2018cv00032 |
| January 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| ALAN C. KAY |
| RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 63) - Signed by JUDGE ALAN C. KAY on 9/30/2021.For the reasons discussed above, the Court GRANTS Defendant Mayorkas's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 63. There being no remaining claims in this case, the Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to enter judgment and close this case.(jni)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF MICHAEL BOTELHO'S MOTION FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND STAY PENDING THAT APPEAL re: 33 - Signed by JUDGE ALAN C. KAY on 4/8/2019. (jo)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN'S MOTION TO DISMISS re: 15 . Excerpt of order:"Plaintiff's Rehabilitation Act claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; the Court declines to dismiss Plaintiff's Title VII claims; and Defendant Transportation Security Administration is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE." IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by SR. U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE ALAN C. KAY on 12/26/2018. (afc)Defendant Transportation Security Administration terminated. WRITTEN ORDER follows hearing held 12/17/2018. Minutes of hearing: ECF 28 .
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
