Wilson et al v. Government National Mortgage Association et al
| Bryant Delmar Wilson and Tanisha Janeen Wilson |
| Government National Mortgage Association and Citimortgage, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv00048 |
| February 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER Granting Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc.'s Motion To Dismiss With Leave To Amend re 9 ."Plaintiffs Bryant Delmar Wilson and Tanisha Janeen Wilson ("Plaintiffs") have filed a multicount Complaint that appears to allege wrongful conduct regarding a mortgage loan Plaintiffs obtained on certain property in Kapolei, Hawaii (the Property). Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc. (CitiMortgage) has moved to dismiss the Complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b )(6), and 12(b)(7). For the following reasons, Motion is GRANTED; Plaintiffs are granted leave to file an Amended Complaint in compliance with this decision no later than June 20, 2018." Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 5/18/2018. (cib, )COURTS CERTIFICATE of Service - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
