Kennedy v. Ritter, et al.
Kuuleialoha M. Kennedy |
Johannes Bruno Ritter and Jane Does 1-3 |
1:2018cv00259 |
July 2, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
KEVIN SC CHANG |
DERRICK K WATSON |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Johannes Bruno Ritter. (afc) |
Filing 5 CLERK OF COURT'S MEMORANDUM re: Corporate Disclosure Statements. (afc) |
Filing 4 Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:00AM on 8/27/2018 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 7/2/2018. (afc) ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO re: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT. |
Filing 3 Summons (Proposed) (Seitz, Eric) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment to U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON and U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG. Please reflect Civil case number CV 18-00259-DKW-KSC on all further pleadings. (afc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0975-2054923.), filed by Kuuleialoha M Kennedy. (Attachments: #1 Demand for Jury Trial, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seitz, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.