Murata et al. v. Nielsen, et al.
Plaintiff: Wayde Murata and Yoshimi Ito Murata
Defendant: Lee Francis Cissna, Christopher M. Robinson, David Gulick, Evangeline McKee and Kirstjen M. Nielsen
Case Number: 1:2018cv00267
Filed: July 9, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: KEVIN SC CHANG
Referring Judge: J MICHAEL SEABRIGHT
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1361
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2018 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General: (Attachments: Summons issued - DAVID GULICK, District Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, AND: #1 Summons issued - CHRISTOPHER M. ROBINSON, Honolulu Field Office Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, #2 Summons issued - EVANGELINE McKEE, Honolulu Field Office Official and Adjudicator, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, #3 Summons issued - LEE FRANCIS CISSNA, National Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, #4 Summons issued - KRISTJEN M. NIELSEN, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security) (afc)
July 9, 2018 Filing 4 Summons (Proposed) (Cosio, Fernando)
July 9, 2018 Filing 3 *CLERK'S RE-ENTRY OF COMPLAINT FILED AS ECF #1 *COMPLAINT FOR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants (Filing fee as recorded in ECF #1 : $ 400 receipt number 0975-2057605.)- filed by Yoshimi Ito Murata, Wayde Murata. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A *Exhibit A viewing restricted to case participants. Personal identifiers disclosed, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J) (afc) Docket text entry modified on 7/10/2018. REDACTED Exhibit to be filed. (afc)
July 9, 2018 ADVISORY ENTRY. Please be advised that the Exhibits included in ECF #1 are comprised of several exhibits and not submitted as separate pdf-attachments. The filing party may refer to Local Rule 100.2.5 "Exhibits" for guidance with respect to submitting separate PDF-Attachments in a multi-part document. In order to demonstrate the manner in affixing attachments, the Clerk's office will re-enter the Complaint. (afc)
July 9, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment to CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT and U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG. Please reflect Civil case number CV 18-00267-JMS-KSC on all further pleadings. (afc)
July 9, 2018 Filing 1 *DOCUMENT RE-ENTERED AS ECF #3 * COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0975-2057605.), filed by wayde murata. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit documents (Viewing restricted to case participants. Personal identifiers disclosed), #3 Exhibit documents (Viewing restricted to case participants. Personal identifiers disclosed))(Cosio, Fernando) Docket text entry modified on 7/9/2018 (afc). Docket text entry modified on 7/10 and 7/11/2018 re: viewing restriction(afc).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murata et al. v. Nielsen, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wayde Murata
Represented By: Fernando L. Cosio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yoshimi Ito Murata
Represented By: Fernando L. Cosio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lee Francis Cissna
Represented By: Edric Ming-Kai Ching
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher M. Robinson
Represented By: Edric Ming-Kai Ching
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Gulick
Represented By: Edric Ming-Kai Ching
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Evangeline McKee
Represented By: Edric Ming-Kai Ching
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kirstjen M. Nielsen
Represented By: Edric Ming-Kai Ching
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?