Kawamura v. Nordstrom, Inc.
| Jamie M. Kawamura |
| Nordstrom, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00094 |
| February 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| KENNETH J MANSFIELD |
| J MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 EO: On April 10, 2019, counsel Andrea Lux Miyashita informs the Court that the parties are entering into Arbitration, therefore jointly request to continue Rule 16 Scheduling Conference. Request is granted. The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference previously set for 04/22/2019 IS CONTINUED TO 05/09/2019 at 9:30 a.m. before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD. Scheduling conference statement are due by 05/02/2019. Parties have been notified. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD)(bbb) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrea Lux Miyashita on behalf of Nordstrom, Inc. on behalf of Nordstrom, Inc.. (Miyashita, Andrea) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Nordstrom, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Wang, Sarah) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Nordstrom, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Wang, Sarah) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jamie M. Kawamura: Defendant Nordstrom, Inc. served on 3/14/2019 (jo) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet. (Attachments: #1 AO 398- Notice of Lawsuit, #2 AO 399- Waiver of Summons)(cib) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Nordstrom, Inc.. (cib) |
Filing 3
Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 9:30AM on 4/22/2019 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 2/22/2019. (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Memo re: Corporate Disclosure)(cib) ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO re: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT. (Main Document 3 replaced on 4/4/2019 with the correct case number listed on the order setting rule 16 scheduling conference) (cib).
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment; Please reflect Civil case number CV 19-00094-JMS-KJM on all further pleadings. (cib) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nordstrom, Inc. Jamie M. Kawamura ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0975-2162415.), filed by Jamie M. Kawamura. (Attachments: #1 Jury Demand, #2 Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brower, Charles) Docket Text Modified on 2/25/2019 (jo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kawamura v. Nordstrom, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nordstrom, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Sarah O. Wang |
| Represented By: | Andrea Lux Miyashita |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jamie M. Kawamura | |
| Represented By: | Charles H. Brower |
| Represented By: | Michael P. Healy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
