Vargas vs. City and County of Honolulu, et al.
| Sarah Vargas |
| City and County of Honolulu, Corporal Costa and David Oh |
| 1:2019cv00116 |
| March 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| LESLIE E KOBAYASHI |
| RICHARD L PUGLISI |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
NOTICE of Appearance by Tracy S. Fukui on behalf of City and County of Honolulu on behalf of City and County of Honolulu. (Fukui, Tracy)
|
|
Filing 18
NOTICE of Hearing on Motion #17 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to State a Claim filed March 6, 2019 Pursuant to FRCP, Rule 12(b)(6). Motion Hearing is set for 7/19/2019 09:45 AM before JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI. (tl, )
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION to Dismiss for failure to State a Claim filed March 6, 2019 Pursuant to FRCP, Rule 12(b)(6) Audrey L.E. Stanley appearing for Defendant City and County of Honolulu (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #2 Main Document Certificate of Word Count, #3 Certificate of Service)(Stanley, Audrey)
|
|
Filing 16
EO: Based on counsel's request, the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED to 6/21/2019 at 9:30 a.m. in the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Richard L. Puglisi. Plaintiff shall notify Defendants. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD L. PUGLISI) (agh)
|
|
Filing 15
EO: Based on Plaintiff's counsel request, the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED from 5/1/2019 to 6/6/2019 at 9:30 AM in the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Richard L. Puglisi. Plaintiff shall notify Defendants.(MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD L. PUGLISI) (agh)
|
|
Filing 14
SUMMONS Returned Executed: Defendant Corporal Costa served on 3/22/2019 (jo)
|
|
Filing 13
SUMMONS Returned Executed as to City and County of Honolulu served on 3/20/2019 filed by Sarah Vargas. (cib)
|
|
Filing 12
Summons Issued as to City and County of Honolulu, Corporal Costa, David Oh. (Attachments: #1 Issued Summons to Costa, #2 Issues Summons to Oh)(cib)
|
|
Filing 11
Summons (Proposed) (Mackintosh, Brian)
|
|
Filing 10
Summons (Proposed) (Mackintosh, Brian)
|
|
Filing 9
Summons (Proposed) (Mackintosh, Brian)
|
|
Filing 8
CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet ~ Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Attachments: #1 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons, #2 Waiver of the Service of Summons) (jo)
|
|
Filing 7
Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 09:00 AM on 5/1/2019 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD L. PUGLISI - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 3/6/2019. (Attachments: #1 Memo from Clerk Re: Corporate Disclosure Statement) ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURES MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT.(jo)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil Case Number CV 19-00116 LEK-RLP on all further pleadings. (jo)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons (Proposed) (Mackintosh, Brian)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons (Proposed) (Mackintosh, Brian)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons (Proposed) (Mackintosh, Brian)
|
|
Filing 2
DEMAND for Trial by Jury. (Mackintosh, Brian)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against City and County of Honolulu ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0975-2167728.), filed by Sarah Vargas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mackintosh, Brian)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
