Hester v. Horowitz et al
| Jason Hester |
| Sherri Kane and Leonard G. Horowitz |
| Howard M.S. Hu, John S. Carroll, Paul J. Sulla, Jr., Halai Heights, LLC, Gary Victor Dubin and Stephen D. Whittaker |
| 1:2019cv00275 |
| May 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| JILL A OTAKE |
| ROM TRADER |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
AMENDED Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:00AM on 7/1/2019 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 6/3/2019. (cib)COURTS CERTIFICATE of Service - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| ADVISORY ENTRY. No further action necessary. The Clerk's office inadvertently scheduled the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for July 29, 2019 at 9:00am before Judge Rom Trader. For Notice of Removal cases the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 30 days of when the notice of removal is filed in Federal Court. The Correct Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for July 1, 2019 at 9:00 am before Judge Trader. An Amended Rule Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Order has been entered, document #6 . (cib) |
| COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of Advisory Entry,, #6 Set Rule 16 Scheduling Conference, has been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record on Leonard G. Horowitz and Sherri Kane. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (cib) |
|
Filing 5
Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:00AM on 7/29/2019 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 5/31/2019. (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Memo re: Corporate Disclosure)(cib)COURTS CERTIFICATE of Service - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE To Adverse Parties Of Removal To Federal Court Of Third Circuit Court Proceedings and "Motion To Show Cause"[FRCP Rule 5]; Certificate of Service filed by Leonard G. Horowitz, Sherri Kane re #1 #3 . (cib)COURTS CERTIFICATE of Service - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 3 EX Parte MOTION for Order to Show Cause Why 'Writ of Ejectment' Should Not Issue For Horowitz Et. Al.'s Repossession Of The Wrongly Foreclosed Subject Property Within 30 Days of This Notice To Vacate, OrIn The Alternative Following A Hearing On Motion, As Ordered By The Court filed by Defendants Leonard G. Horowitz, Sherri Kane. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Leonard G. Horowitz and Sherri Kane, #2 Writ of Ejectment; Return of Service on Writ of Ejection)(cib) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 400.00,receipt number HI026541 re #1 Notice of Removal. (cib) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Leonard G. Horowitz, Sherri Kane from Intermediate Court of Appeal, case number CAAP-18-0000584, filed by Leonard G. Horowitz, Sherri Kane. (Attachments: #1 complaint for deprivation of rights, #2 declaration of Leonard G. Horowitz and Sherri Kane, #3 Appendix A, #4 Appendix B, #5 Exhibit 1, #6 Exhibit 2, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(cib) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
