Turner v. Newsom et al
| Steven Deon Turner, Jr. |
| William Joe Sullivan, Scott Kernan, Siannah Collado, State of California, Governor Gavin Newsom, Los Angeles County, Jackie Lacie and John or Jane Doe Director of Corrections (CDCR) |
| 1:2019cv00338 |
| June 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| KENNETH J MANSFIELD |
| DERRICK K WATSON |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number HI027000 re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (emt, ) |
| Filing 14 USCA Case Number 19-16525 for #13 Notice of Appeal filed by Steven Deon Turner, Jr: A briefing schedule will not be set until the court determines whether a certificate of appealability should issue. (emt, ) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEAL re #10 , #11 - by Steven Deon Turner, Jr. (emt, ) Modified on 8/5/2019: USCA NO. 19-16525 (emt, ). |
| Filing 12 Letter from Steven Deon Turner, Jr., dated July 9, 2019 and received on July 15, 2019. (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Office Intake Staff's Response to Mr. Turner's Letter, dated July 16, 2019) (emt, ) |
| Filing 11 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered on 7/3/2019 pursuant to ECF No. #10 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. (emt, ) |
Filing 10
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY re #1 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 7/3/2019. The Court lacks jurisdiction and venue over this Petition, and the interests of justice do not support transfer. The Petition is DISMISSED. Jurists of reason cannot disagree that Turner fails to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, and thus any request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003); 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1(A). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and terminate this case. (emt, )
|
| COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of the #10 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY, and #11 Clerk's Judgment has been served by First Class Mail to Steven Deon Turner, Jr. at the address of record on July 3, 2019. (emt, ) |
|
Filing 9
HABEAS DEFICIENCY ORDER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 6/28/2019. (emt, )
|
| Filing 8 Transmittal Letter from Steven Deon Turner, Jr. (emt, ) |
| Filing 7 REQUEST for Entry of Default by Clerk of Court - by Steven Deon Turner, Jr. (emt, ) |
| Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE, DECLARATION - by Steven Deon Turner, Jr. (emt, ) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT and NOTICE - by Steven Deon Turner, Jr. (emt, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE ("Appearance Brief in the Nature of Mandatory Judicial Notice") - by Steven Deon Turner, Jr. (emt, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE ("Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal", "Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent") - by Steven Deon Turner, Jr. (emt, ) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Steven Deon Turner, Jr. in Support of #1 Habeas Corpus and Subjudiciendum - by Steven Deon Turner, Jr. (emt, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Subjudiciendum, Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof - filed by Steven Deon Turner, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Criminal Complaint, #2 Order from Second Appellate District Court, B296213 (and other documents), #3 Mailing Documentation) (emt, ) Modified on 7/2/2019 (emt, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
