Kiyabu v. Saul

Plaintiff: Tamra D. Kiyabu
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 1:2019cv00382
Filed: July 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Presiding Judge: KENNETH J MANSFIELD
Referring Judge: J MICHAEL SEABRIGHT
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General. (cib)
July 16, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment; Please reflect Civil case number CV 19-00382-JMS-KJM on all further pleadings. (cib)
July 16, 2019 Filing 2 Summons (Proposed) (Haar, Diane)
July 16, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Tamra D. Kiyabu against Andrew M. Saul ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0975-2232716.), filed by Tamra D. Kiyabu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Haar, Diane)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kiyabu v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamra D. Kiyabu
Represented By: Diane C. Haar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?