Yang v. McAleenan
Plaintiff: Jinghi Yang
Defendant: Kevin McAleenan
Case Number: 1:2019cv00472
Filed: August 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Nature of Suit: Naturalization Application
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kevin McAleenan against Jinghi Yang ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0975-2255999.), filed by Jinghi Yang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Final Decision of USCIS, #2 Exhibit Excerpt of Law, #3 Exhibit Letter, #4 Exhibit Initial Decision of USCIS, #5 Exhibit Letter, #6 Exhibit Excerpt of Foreign Constitution, #7 Exhibit Excerpt of I-485, #8 Exhibit Excerpt of N-400, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cosio, Fernando)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yang v. McAleenan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jinghi Yang
Represented By: Fernando L. Cosio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin McAleenan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?