Hubbard v. United States of America (OPENED IN ERROR - see MC 19-333 LEK-KJM)
Clifford B. Hubbard |
United States and United States of America |
1:2019cv00483 |
September 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Civil Rights: Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ADVISORY ENTRY. Re: The entry docket number #1 Petition for Post-Conviction Preservation and DNA Testing of Evidence and Related Materials filed by Clifford B. Hubbard ~ Please be advised that the filing party has opened a miscellaneous case regarding the petition, refer to MC 19-00333 LEK-KJM. The Clerk's Office will close this civil case. The filing party is advised to contact the Financial Department for the District of Hawaii to request a refund of the filing fee incurred in the opening of this civil case. (emt, ) |
Filing 1 Petition for Post-Conviction Preservation and DNA Testing of Evidence and Related Materials First Miscellaneous Case Filing Fee/USA Applications Filing fee $ 47, receipt number 0975-2258368., filed by Clifford B Hubbard. (Attachments: #1 Table of Contents, Table of Authorities, #2 Memorandum Memorandum in Support of Petition, #3 Declaration Declaration of Jennifer Brown, #4 Exhibit List, #5 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service)(Brown, Jennifer) Docket text modified on 9/9/2019 (emt, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.