Schulze v. Kobayashi
| Michael F. Schulze |
| Hiromichi Kobayashi |
| 1:2019cv00558 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| LESLIE E KOBAYASHI |
| KENNETH J MANSFIELD |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Petitioner's NOTICE of Resolution and Voluntary Withdrawal of His Habeas Petition Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2241; Certificate of Service re #1 - by Michael F. Schulze. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Documentation) (emt, ) |
| COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of the 3 Minute Order shall be served by First Class Mail to Petitioner Michael F. Schulze at the address of record on October 17, 2019. A copy of the Minute Order shall be served by First Class Mail to FDC Warden Hiromichi Kobayashi at FDC Honolulu, P. O. Box 30547, Honolulu, HI on October 17, 2019. Additionally, a copy of the Minute Order shall be served to the U.S. Attorney's Office through interoffice delivery on October 17, 2019. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (emt, ) |
| Filing 3 EO: On October 15, 2019, pro se Petitioner Michael F. Schulze filed a Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1]. It not appearing plainly from the face of the petition that Schulze is not entitled to relief, and it further appearing that the petition is in compliance with the rules governing the form of such petitions, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, which applies to petitions brought under 28 U.S.C. 2241, that Respondent FDC-Honolulu Warden Hiromichi Kobayashi file an answer to the petition on or before November 15, 2019. Schulze may file an optional reply on or before December 6, 2019. The Clerk's Office is instructed to serve the instant entering order on Petitioner Schulze, Respondent FDC-Honolulu Warden Hiromichi, and on the United States Attorney for the District of Hawaii. IT IS SO ORDERED. (JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI)(tl, ) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number HI027444 re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (emt, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus - filed by Michael F. Schulze. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter, #2 Mailing Documentation) (emt, ) Modified on 10/15/2019, see ECF No. #2 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number HI027444 (emt, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schulze v. Kobayashi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael F. Schulze | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Hiromichi Kobayashi | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
