Kham v. Tham, et al.
| Sunnary Kham and Sam Kham |
| Jane Does 1-10, John Does 1-10, Doe Corporations 1-10, Roe "Non-Profit" Corporations 1-10, Doe Partnerships 1-10 and Roe Governmental Entities 1-10 |
| Thanty Tham |
| Doe Corporations, Partnerships and Other Entities 1-10 and Michael L. Prather |
| 1:2019cv00606 |
| November 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| J MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
| ROM TRADER |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ALL CLAIMS AND PARTIES AND ORDER by Thanty Tham - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 12/10/2019. (jo)
|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Thanty Tham Re: 1) Tham's Responses to Plaintiff's First Request for Answers to Interrogatories and First Request for Production of Documents dated October 8, 2019 (Fieman, Jason) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Case Reassignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 19-00606 JMS -RT on all further pleadings. (emt, ) |
| Filing 8 Consent Election Form |
| Filing 7 TRANSMITTAL of DOCUMENTS from the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, state of Hawaii. 1CC181001652. (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Certificate, #2 Case Detail Docket List, #3 Complaint; Summons 18-1-1652-10, #4 Civil Info Sheet) (apg, ) |
| Filing 6 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT Thanty Tham's against Michael L. Prather, THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT Thanty Tham's against Michael L. Prather, filed by Thanty Tham. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "1", #2 Certificate of Service)(Fieman, Jason) Modified on 11/12/2019 to remove duplicate parties (emt, ). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Attachments: #1 Election Form: Consent to Jurisdiction by United States Magistrate Judge) (ens) ATTACH THE NOTICE AND ELECTION FORM TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE NOTICE AND ELECTION FORM MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT. Each party must indicate consent or decline to consent by completing the attached Election Form and filing it with the court no later than twenty-one (21) days after entry of appearance. In the event a dispositive motion is filed prior to the date on which the submission of the Election Form is required, the parties must return the completed Election Form within seven (7) calendar days after the motion is filed. |
| Filing 4 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet ~ Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Attachments: #1 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #2 Waiver of the Service of Summons)(ens) |
|
Filing 3
Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 09:00AM on 1/6/2020 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 11/5/2019. (Attachments: #1 Clerk's Memo Regarding Corporate Disclosure Statements) ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURES MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT.(ens)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil Case Number CV 19-00606 RT on all further pleadings. (ens) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Thanty Tham from Circuit Court of the First Circuit, case number 18-1-1652-10. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0975-2286786), filed by Thanty Tham.(Fieman, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
