Heidenfeldt v. Kobayashi
Petitioner: Gary M. Heidenfeldt
Respondent: Hiromichi Kobayashi
Case Number: 1:2019cv00639
Filed: November 27, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Presiding Judge: WES REBER PORTER
Referring Judge: J MICHAEL SEABRIGHT
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2020 Filing 7 EO: Status Conference held. The parties agree that the issues presented in the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 For a Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF 1], are now moot. Thus, with agreement of both parties, the Court DISMISSES this action as moot, without prejudice to Petitioner refiling a new action if warranted. The clerk of court is directed to close the case file. IT IS SO ORDERED. (CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT)(rlfh)
January 24, 2020 Filing 6 EP: Further Status Conference held.Gary M. Heidenfeldt participated by telephone.Discussion held.Government stated that the FDC Honolulu Warden has reconsidered Petitioner's request for elderly offender home detention, and has found that Petitioner does qualify.Court to issue a written order. (Court Reporter Debra Read.) (CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT)(rlfh)
January 22, 2020 Filing 5 EO: Status Conference set for 01/24/2020 at 2:15 PM is moved to 11:00 AM the same day in Aha Kaulike before CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT. (CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT)(rlfh)
January 21, 2020 Filing 4 EP: Status Conference held.Gary M. Heidenfeldt participated by telephone.Discussion held.Government to follow up with the Honolulu Federal Detention Center on the status of Petitioners request for early release.Further Status Conference is set for January 24, 2020 at 2:15 pm before the Honorable J. Michael Seabright. Government to make arrangements with Honolulu FDC for Petitioner to participate by telephone.(Court Reporter Debra Read.) (CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT)(rlfh)
January 16, 2020 Filing 3 EO: Status Conference is set for 01/21/2020 at 10:00 AM in Aha Kaulike before CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT. Plaintiff Heidenfeldt to participate by telephone. (CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT)(rlfh)
December 2, 2019 Filing 2 EO: On November 27, 2019, the court received Petitioner Gary M. Heidenfeldt's "Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 For a Writ of Habeas Corpus." ECF No. #1 . The Government is DIRECTED to file a Response by January 13, 2020, and Petitioner may file an optional Reply no later than February 10, 2020. (CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT)(rlfh)
November 27, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 For a Writ of Habeas Corpus - filed by Gary M. Heidenfeldt (Attachments: #1 Receipt #HI027761 for Filing Fee, #2 Mailing Envelope) (jo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Heidenfeldt v. Kobayashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Hiromichi Kobayashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gary M. Heidenfeldt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?