Emrit v. Horus Music Video Distribution et al
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: TIDAL, Horus Music Video Distribution and PayPal
Case Number: 1:2020cv00007
Filed: January 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Presiding Judge: J MICHAEL SEABRIGHT
Referring Judge: ROM TRADER
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2020 Filing 10 EO: The Court CONTINUES the. Rule 16 Scheduling Conference previously set for 03/09/2020 at 9:00 a.m. to 05/07/2020 at 9:00 a.m. before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER)(jp)COURTS CERTIFICATE of Service - Ronald Satish Emrit has been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
March 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION, OR DISMISSED OR TRANSFERRED FOR LACK OF VENUE - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 3/3/2020. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE by March 31, 2020 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or dismissed or transferred for lack of venue. Alternatively, if Plaintiff elects not to proceed with this action, he may file, by March 31, 2020, a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice to pursue his claims in an appropriate venue. Failure to file, by March 31, 2020, a response to this Order to Show Cause or a notice of voluntary dismissal will result in the court sua sponte dismissing this action without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and/or venue, and for failure to comply with this Order to Show Cause. Further, Plaintiff's IFP Application will be held in abeyance pending the filing of notice of voluntary dismissal or a response to this Order to Show Cause. Show Cause Response due by 3/31/2020(jo)COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Ronald Satish Emrit will be served by First Class Mail on March 4, 2020 to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
February 24, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Case Reassignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 20-00007 JMS-RT on all further pleadings. (emt, )COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - Ronald Satish Emrit shall be served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on February 25, 2020.
February 24, 2020 Filing 7 EO: The Court directs the Clerk's Office to reassign this case to a District Judge. Magistrate Judge Trader will remain as the Magistrate Judge on this case. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER)(jp)COURTS CERTIFICATE of Service - Ronald Satish Emrit has been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
January 6, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Attachments: #1 Election Form: Consent to Jurisdiction by United States Magistrate Judge) (emt, )COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - Ronald Satish Emrit was served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on January 7, 2020.
January 6, 2020 Filing 5 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet ~ Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 AO 398 Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons, #2 AO 399 Waiver of Service of Summons) (emt, )
January 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:00AM on 3/9/2020 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 1/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Memo from Clerk Re: Corporate Disclosure Statements) (emt, )COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - Ronald Satish Emrit was served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on January 7, 2020.
January 6, 2020 Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs - by Plaintiff Ronald Satish Emrit. (emt, )
January 6, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet - by Ronald Satish Emrit. (emt, )
January 6, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants - filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Documentation) (emt, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Emrit v. Horus Music Video Distribution et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TIDAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Horus Music Video Distribution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PayPal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?