Grandinetti v. Ioane et al
Francis Grandinetti, Grandenetti, Grandlnetti and Grandinette |
Jennifer Bechler, Monalisa Pule, Howard Komori, Heather Kimura, Saguaro Correctional Center, Scott Jinbo and John Ioane |
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto |
1:2020cv00086 |
February 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
WES REBER PORTER |
J MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 USCA Case Number: 20-15649 as to #7 Notice of Appeal, filed by Francis Grandinetti (jo)COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Francis Grandinetti will be served by First Class Mail on April 13, 2020 to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 7 Pro Se Plaintiff on NOTICE OF APPEAL, March 5, 2020 Dismissal Order (Ninth Circuit Rule 3.3 Preliminary-Injunction Appeals; FRCP 65) filed by Francis Grandinetti (Filing fee $ 505 DUE) as to #2 Dismissal Order, and #3 Clerk's Judgment USCA No. 20-15649 (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(jni)COURTS CERTIFICATE of Service - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants will be been served by First Class Mail to the address of record on 4/13/2020 listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) Docket Text Modified on 4/13/2020 (jo) |
Filing 6 EO: Plaintiff provides no reasons justifying his Motion for Reconsideration [ECF 5], brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), and it is DENIED. (CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT)(rlfh)COURTS CERTIFICATE of Service - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 5 On Ten-Day FRCP 59(e) reconsideration, with Proof of Service; FRAP 3-4 laws. (Reconsideration or Injunction-Appeal remedies.) - filed by Francis Grandinetti (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (jo) |
Filing 4 Pro Se Plaintiff's Motion for Additional Facts Under FRCP 52, 65, etc. by Francis Grandinetti. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope).(jni) |
COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of #4 Pro Se Plaintiff's Motion for Additional Facts Under FRCP 52, 65, etc. has been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record on 3/10/2020. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (jni) |
Filing 3 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered on 3/5/2020 pursuant to ECF #2 DISMISSAL ORDER (jo)COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Francis Grandinetti will be served by First Class Mail on March 5, 2020 to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 DISMISSAL ORDER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 3/5/2020. (jo)COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Francis Grandinetti will be served by First Class Mail on March 5, 2020 to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 1 On Plaintiff COMPLAINT against the State of Hawaii, DPS/FDC Branch Employees: Newer 2020 Intervening Contract Monitor John Ioane on DPS/FDC Branch Reviews against All Defendants, filed by Francis Grandinetti. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(jni) |
COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of #1 Complaint, has been served by First Class Mail to the address of record to: Francis Grandinetti. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (jni) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.