Broadband iTV, Inc. v. Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
| Broadband iTV, Inc. |
| Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP |
| 1:2020cv00093 |
| February 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| ROM TRADER |
| DERRICK K WATSON |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 REPLY re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court PLAINTIFF BROADBAND ITV, INC.S MOTION TO REMAND PLAINTIFF BROADBAND ITV, INC.S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO REMAND, FILED MARCH 31, 2020 [ECF 7] filed by Broadband iTV, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Rex Y. Fujichaku, #2 Exhibit 4, #3 Exhibit 5, #4 Exhibit 6, #5 Exhibit 7, #6 Exhibit 8, #7 Certificate of Service)(Fujichaku, Rex) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to #7 Plaintiffs Motion to Remand filed by Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Robert Shwarts, #2 Declaration Declaration of Jeffrey Portnoy, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B, #5 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service)(Portnoy, Jeffrey) Modified on 4/7/2020 to add linkage to underlying motion (emt, ). |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Broadband iTV, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Broadband iTV, Inc. for Broadband iTV, Inc... (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Fujichaku, Rex) |
| Filing 8 EO: Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), the Court will decide #7 Plaintiff Broadband ITV, Inc.'s Motion to Remand without a hearing. Briefing on the motion shall be in accordance with Local Rule 7.2. IT IS SO ORDERED. (JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON)(tyk) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court PLAINTIFF BROADBAND ITV, INC.S MOTION TO REMAND Rex Y. Fujichaku appearing for Plaintiff Broadband iTV, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #2 Declaration of Rex Y. Fujichaku, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Certificate of Service)(Fujichaku, Rex) |
| Filing 6 EO: Pursuant to the request Counsel for the Plaintiff, the Court CONTINUES the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference previously set for 04/16/2020 at 9:00 a.m. to 05/15/2020 at 9:00 a.m. before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER)(jp) |
| Filing 5 EO: Pursuant to the request of Counsel for the Defendant and with the agreement of Counsel for the Plaintiff, the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference previously set for 03/30/2020 at 9:00 a.m. is CONTINUED to 04/16/2020 at 9:00 a.m. before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER. Rule 16 Scheduling Conference Statements to be filed by 04/09/2020. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER)(jp) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL Cover Sheet by Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP. (Portnoy, Jeffrey) |
Filing 3
Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:00AM on 3/30/2020 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 2/27/2020. (Attachments: #1 Memo from Clerk Re: Corporate Disclosure Statements) ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURES MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT. (emt, )
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 20-00093 DKW-RT on all further pleadings. (emt, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ; Declaration of Robert S. Shwarts; Exhibit "1"; Certificate of Service by Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0975-2339610), filed by Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.(Portnoy, Jeffrey) Modified on 2/27/2020 (emt, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
