Barth v. Mabry Carlton Ranch Inc. et al

Case Number: 1:2020cv00104
Filed: June 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2020 Filing 17 ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RECUSE AND REJECT MAGISTRATE RECOMMENDATION AND (2) ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR IMPROPER VENUE AND DENY AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S PENDING MOTIONS re 14 , 15 - Signed b y JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE on 6/1/2020. In accordance with the foregoing, the Court HEREBY DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Recuse and Reject Magistrate Recommendation and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Mansfield's Findings an d Recommendation to Dismiss Complaint for Improper Venue and Deny as Moot Plaintiffs Pending Motions. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice and the pending motions are DENIED as moot. (emt, )COURT 'S CERTIFICATE of Service - John S. Barth shall be served by First Class Mail to the address of record (P. O. Box 88 Springvale, ME 04083) listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on June 1, 2020. Additionally, a copy of the order shall be served by First Class Mail to John S. Barth at the following address (see Letter, ECF No. 10 ) 4311 Brazilnut Avenue, Sarasota, FL 34234 on June 1, 2020.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barth v. Mabry Carlton Ranch Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?