Oliver v. Merlo et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Oliver
Defendant: WOFR LLC and Scott Merlo
Case Number: 1:2020cv00145
Filed: April 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Presiding Judge: WES REBER PORTER
Referring Judge: J MICHAEL SEABRIGHT
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2020 Filing 9 EO: The Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for June 1, 2020 is CONTINUED to July 13, 2020 at 9:00 AM before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER. The Court will be using AT&T Connect Audio Conference at 1-888-278-0296 / Access Code: 8224751. Counsel for Plaintiff shall notify Defendants. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER)(mrf)
May 6, 2020 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by WOFR LLC, Scott Merlo. WOFR LLC waiver sent on 4/14/2020, answer due 6/15/2020; Scott Merlo waiver sent on 4/14/2020, answer due 6/15/2020. (Tanaka, Judy)
April 14, 2020 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Scott Merlo, WOFR LLC (jo)
April 9, 2020 Filing 6 Summons (Proposed) (DiPasquale, James)
April 3, 2020 Filing 5 EO: The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for June 1, 2020 at 9:00 AM will be held by telephone. The Court will be using AT&T Connect Audio Conference at 1-888-278-0296 / Access Code: 8224751. Counsel for Plaintiff shall notify Defendants. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER)(mrf)
April 2, 2020 Filing 4 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet ~ Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 AO 398 Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons, #2 AO 399 Waiver of Service of Summons) (emt, )
April 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:00AM on 6/1/2020 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 4/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 Memo from Clerk Re: Corporate Disclosures) ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURES MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT. (emt, )
April 2, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 20-00145 JMS-WRP on all further pleadings. (emt, )
April 2, 2020 Filing 1 Verified COMPLAINT With Jury Demand against Daniel Oliver Scott Merlo, WOFR LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0975-2354567.), filed by Daniel Oliver.(DiPasquale, James) Docket text modified on 4/2/2020 (emt, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oliver v. Merlo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Oliver
Represented By: James Dennis DiPasquale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WOFR LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Merlo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?