Capellan v. West Maui Resort Partners, et al.
Faye Lizette Capellan |
Doe Partnerships 1-5, Doe LLC 1-5, Doe Corporations 1-5, John Does 1-5, Doe Governmental Agencies 1-5, Doe Non-Profit Organizations 1-5, Diamond Resorts, Jane Does 1-5 and West Maui Resort Parners, L.P. |
1:2020cv00172 |
April 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
J MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
ROM TRADER |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 09:00AM on 5/18/2020 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 4/17/2020. (Attachments: #1 Memo From the Clerk Re: Corporate Disclosure Statements) ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURES MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT.(jo) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil Case Number CV 20-00172 JMS-RT on all further pleadings. (jo) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Maui West Resorts Partners, L.P.; Diamond Resorts, et al. from First Circuit, case number 19-1-1650-10 (BIA). ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0975-2360372), filed by Maui West Resorts. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Gregory M. Sato, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Declaration of Calder Huntington, #4 Certificate of Service, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sato, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.